I think its time to start migrating out of Notability if this is how they want to do things. I have WAY too much information there to have that level of risk. I don’t do subscribing apps for things like Notability. I’m going to be seriously pissed if my access gets revoked. “I bought the app assuming the current functionality was going to be accessible forever.
#Apps like notability full#
For example, let customers who have already purchased a “full game unlock” continue to access the full game after you introduce a subscription model for new customers.Īpp owners expressed their anger at the move. If you are changing your existing app to a subscription-based business model, you should not take away the primary functionality existing users have already paid for. Some pointed out that this broke App Store Review Guideline 3.1.2(a), and said that they had reported it to Apple. Users who had already paid for the app were quite rightly unimpressed. After that, they would have to start paying the subscription fee like anyone else. The company announced that existing customers – that is, those who had already purchased the app and its optional premium features – would only retain access to them for a year. The company announced a switch to a subscription model, which is rarely a change that goes down well – but the bigger controversy here was regarding those who had previously purchased the app … Some existing owners pointed out that the developer was breaking App Store rules. A major backlash to this week’s Notability subscription announcement has forced the developer of the popular note-taking app to make a U-turn in the way it treats existing purchasers.
0 kommentar(er)
